Actually Judd, I wasn't thinking specifically about your comments. I was thinking about comments of others like, "After all the name calling and losing so decidedly," which make the poster's editorial point of view very clear (and which I found annoying, notwithstanding whether I actually agreed with them). I can't speak to oenyaw's comments, because I did not see them before they were deleted. My point was that if you can't talk about it, you shouldn't--it's more of a bright-line test for me. Maybe I have more of a hair-trigger about these things because the opposing parties I have had to deal with in my day job test the "boundaries" on a regular basis, and not always in an honest sort of way. I also feel that people here don't even have the same understanding about what is implicit and what is acceptable, so what is the point of arguing about it. There are too many other things that are worth doing and can be done.