As it seems that this issue needs to be discussed more into detail, i thought to open a new thread.
Especially this statement I find on the edge of respecting other artists work:
in this sound style... the tolerance is higher then for other music for sure…..
A lot of music i sample based and are using sampling all the time, hip hop for instance, the genre would not exist if it wasn't for sampling or stealing, but as long as you do something artistic with it, or put it in a new context I think it is creative..
Also I think it depends on what is being sampled, a melody for instance... but even with that you should not have alone rights on a melody just because some one was first, if some mind can come up with a melody I am sure another mind can come up with the same with time, Also a samples used but put in a different context or music style I think is a way of using it artistically..
I just do not think all this commercial bullshit should interfere with the artistic output, let the music be free,
It clearly suggests that using other artists music is OK as long as you make something "new" out of it, no matter if you have the permission to do so. Such kind of statement made me think of just 2 possible explanations:
1. the author just want to excuse and justify those usage for whatever reason
2. the author don´t know about any legal terms