« on: March 28, 2008, 11:07:23 AM »
I remember seeing that interview, it was done back in the mid 1980s. Its just as disturbing now as it was then. He is in California, at the time he was in Vacaville state prison in Northern California.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I don't think I'd have to be "highly" cynical unless I had good reason to be, and judging by the fact the label itself is stuck with what, 1,000 copies that aren't selling forcing them to practically give it away,
and then discovering, by coincidence, 80 sets of only the other two discs...when I read the "explanation" for all of this my intelligence was insulted.
The description states Projekt decided to scrap the idea of reissuing the other two to "focus on other SR projects." Is this really the case? . . . Sorry, I guess my cynicism sometimes gets the best of me.
Loren, thanks for looking more into the .iso format. Perhaps I'm not as idealistic about it as I was before. It's frustrating that there is a standard and yet companies don't adhere to it even when they use that "standard".
Disc Description Protocol (DDP) files are delivered as data on a CD-ROM or DVD-ROM. The error correction employed on data discs is designed to be more robust than that of audio CDs. This ensures that the audio master that the plant gets will not have any errors in the data.
I've never heard any "jittering" either.
Going by the more restrictive definition, an "ISO" is created by copying an entire disc, from sector 0 to the end, into a file. Because the image file contains "cooked" 2048-byte sectors and nothing else, it isn't possible to store anything but a single data track in this fashion. Audio tracks, mixed-mode discs, CD+G, multisession, and other fancy formats can't be represented.
There's no difference in the 1's and 0's going onto the disc.
I like what Johnny Greenwood (Radiohead) said about audio....
when I was 15-25, I NEVER listened to the music my parents listened to. No one could even imagine a party in 1979 where everyone was sitting around listening to Nat King Cole, Buck Owens, or Stan Getz. I do now, but back then, no way. We had our own music to listen to.
My experience of CDs is that both CDr and pressed CDs last equally well ... in fact I've had more trouble with pressed ones going bad in my collection.
There is no real difference in audio quality due to the actual disc itself. In fact, if anyone is sitting there straining to hear the supposed "differences" between the two then they are really missing out on the experience the music offers. It's all about the mastering.
PS If you are in the links section of the site and want to be updated, just let me know
Too bad Laura Escudé and Kathie Talbot's set was plagued with technical glitches galore complete with incredibly poor graphics. They had so much potential and I loved Kathie's voice and her Louise Brooks bob hairdo.
Robert Rich had the right idea nixing laptops and sticking with his Korg's and MOTM modular.
His set was by far the best of the three, too bad so many people split in the middle of it. Too trendy for the room I guess.
Get a job. The rest I will think about once I can pay the bills.
Is cable quality an issue when using digital signals?
Speakers are still (mostly) analog; does cheap wire make THAT much of a difference? Or, as in the article, none at all?
The monitors are Behringer Truth B0231's.
Basically they are generic Mackie HR824's. For $300, they are a great deal!