Author Topic: Should've called it "World War D"  (Read 692 times)

drone on

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1720
    • View Profile
Should've called it "World War D"
« on: June 23, 2013, 09:11:57 PM »
D for DUMB.  I wasted several hours and $10.75 on Brad Pitts zombie movie.  Awful film, not scary or even suspenseful.  People in the theatre were laughing at the zombies and the stupid dialogue.  Save your money...

judd stephens

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
    • View Profile
Re: Should've called it "World War D"
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2013, 10:04:44 PM »
maybe World War ZZZZZ for snooze?

chris23

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
    • View Profile
    • bandcamp profile
Re: Should've called it "World War D"
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2013, 08:26:36 PM »
A comic from The Oatmeal that you'll appreciate:



9dragons

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 586
  • The Viatorium Press - Dedicated to the Weird
    • View Profile
    • The Viatorium Press - Dedicated to the Weird
Re: Should've called it "World War D"
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2013, 12:04:08 PM »
Avoid this movie like the plague. Just wasted my dollars on VOD for this dud of a movie. Should have known with the PG rating or whatever it was, that it would not satisfy. You just cannot cut away from gore like that and have a satisfying zombie movie. Romero's movies are up on youtube, I would suggest a re-watch of Day of the Dead instead of this watered down excuse.