« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Should've called it "World War D"  (Read 8397 times)

drone on

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2005
    • View Profile
Should've called it "World War D"
« on: June 23, 2013, 09:11:57 PM »
D for DUMB.  I wasted several hours and $10.75 on Brad Pitts zombie movie.  Awful film, not scary or even suspenseful.  People in the theatre were laughing at the zombies and the stupid dialogue.  Save your money...
Logged

judd stephens

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 499
    • View Profile
Re: Should've called it "World War D"
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2013, 10:04:44 PM »
maybe World War ZZZZZ for snooze?
Logged

chris23

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1021
    • View Profile
    • bandcamp profile
Re: Should've called it "World War D"
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2013, 08:26:36 PM »
A comic from The Oatmeal that you'll appreciate:


Logged

9dragons

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 565
  • The Viatorium Press - Dedicated to the Weird
    • View Profile
    • The Viatorium Press - Dedicated to the Weird
Re: Should've called it "World War D"
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2013, 12:04:08 PM »
Avoid this movie like the plague. Just wasted my dollars on VOD for this dud of a movie. Should have known with the PG rating or whatever it was, that it would not satisfy. You just cannot cut away from gore like that and have a satisfying zombie movie. Romero's movies are up on youtube, I would suggest a re-watch of Day of the Dead instead of this watered down excuse.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »